About 10 results for Lozman v. City of Riviera Beach
en.wikipedia.org › Lozman_v._City_of_Riviera_Beach_(2013)

Lozman v. City of Riviera Beach (2013)

Lozman v. City of Riviera Beach, 568 U.S. 115 (2013), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a vessel in admiralty law is something that a reasonable observer would consider designed for water transportation. The case...

Updated: September 5, 2026
en.wikipedia.org › Lozman_v._City_of_Riviera_Beach

Lozman v. City of Riviera Beach

Fane Lozman and the city of Riviera Beach, Florida, have been parties to a number of lawsuits, two of which have been heard by the United States Supreme Court. In Lozman v. City of Riviera Beach, 568 U.S. 115 (2013), the Supreme Court ruled that a...

Updated: March 17, 2023
en.wikipedia.org › Lozman_v._City_of_Riviera_Beach_(2018)

Lozman v. City of Riviera Beach (2018)

Lozman v. City of Riviera Beach, 585 U.S. 87 (2018), is a case in which the United States Supreme Court decided that the mere existence of probable cause for an arrest did not bar the plaintiff's First Amendment retaliatory arrest claim, but...

Updated: July 13, 2026
en.wikipedia.org › Fane_Lozman

Fane Lozman

Fane Lozman is an American inventor and futures and options trader known for his long-running legal battles with the city of Riviera Beach, Florida. His litigation against the city has reached the U.S. Supreme Court twice: a 2013 case about whether...

Updated: October 15, 2026
en.wikipedia.org › Citizens_United_v._FEC

Citizens United v. FEC

Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310 (2010), is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States ruling that certain campaign finance restrictions are inconsistent with the Free Speech Clause of the First...

Updated: October 17, 2026
en.wikipedia.org › Novak_v._City_of_Parma

Novak v. City of Parma

Novak v. City of Parma, 33 F.4th 296 (6th Cir. 2022), is a decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit granting qualified immunity to the city of Parma, Ohio, and its officials for prosecuting Anthony Novak over a Facebook...

Updated: October 12, 2026
en.wikipedia.org › Brandenburg_v._Ohio

Brandenburg v. Ohio

Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969), is a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court interpreting the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The Court held that the government cannot punish inflammatory speech unless that speech is...

Updated: September 12, 2026
en.wikipedia.org › Schenck_v._United_States

Schenck v. United States

Schenck v. United States, 249 U.S. 47 (1919), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court concerning enforcement of the Espionage Act of 1917 during World War I. A unanimous Supreme Court, in an opinion by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr.,...

Updated: May 13, 2026
en.wikipedia.org › National_Socialist_Party_of_America_v._Village_of_Skokie

National Socialist Party of America v. Village of Skokie

National Socialist Party of America v. Village of Skokie, 432 U.S. 43 (1977), arising out of what is sometimes referred to as the Skokie Affair, is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States dealing with freedom of speech and...

Updated: May 20, 2026